Clean Water Action

Login | Register
Explore Your Community | Discover the Issues
  • Issues
    • Clean Water's Mission
    • Protecting America's Water
    • Global Warming and a New Energy Economy
    • Healthy, Safer Families and Communities
    • Making Democracy Work
  • States
    • California
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • DC
    • Delaware
    • Florida
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Minnesota
    • New Hampshire
    • New Jersey
    • Pennsylvania
    • Rhode Island
    • Texas
    • Virginia
    • National
  • About Us
    • Finances & Effectiveness
    • Offices
    • Board & Officers
    • Senior Staff
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
  • Canvass
  • Jobs
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Apply for a canvass job
  • Media Center
    • Press Releases
    • Media Contacts
  • Publications
    • 2011 Congressional Scorecard
    • Newsletters
    • Reports, Summaries
    • Factsheets
  • Supporter Center
    • 2012 Board of Directors Election
    • 2012 National Member Poll
    • Subscription Maintenance
  • Take Action
    • National Actions
    • Actions by State
    • Volunteer
    • Join the Clean Water Movement
  • Join or Give
    • Donate Now
    • Ways to Give
    • Why Your Support Matters
    • About Your Membership
    • Get the CleanWater Card
  • Blog
    • Subscribe
 

Donate Now

Join or give a gift or find other ways to give to Clean Water Action

Our Birthday

40 years
of
clean water progress

Search

Barnegat Bay study a DEP priority, says agency's new leader

TRENTON - New Jersey's acting environmental executive wants a fuller diagnosis of Barnegat Bay's problems, strongly supports erecting wind turbines off the coast and has serious concerns about proposed liquefied natural gas facilities offshore.

"I don't believe we've done enough research on the entire bay. . . . We have pockets of data," said Bob Martin, acting commissioner for the state Department of Environmental Protection. "I believe we need a full environmental assessment of Barnegat Bay."

Oyster Creek decision

Similarly, the DEP needs to fully understand how the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant in Lacey fits into that picture, Martin said. There is no question the reactor's cooling water intake affects the bay ecosystem, but "I don't know if that's 5 percent or 95 percent" of the bay's problems, Martin said. During his election campaign, Christie won endorsement from the New Jersey Environmental Federation partly on the strength of his pledge to do something about the plant's water use.

Even as it proceeds with a draft permit to require cooling towers - a process started in the last days of the Corzine administration, continuing today with a public hearing in Trenton - Martin said the DEP will start a parallel dialogue with Oyster Creek operator Exelon Corp., environmental groups and other interests.

Published Date: 
03/03/2010
News Source: 
Asbury Park Press
  • Printer-friendly version
Tags:
  • New Jersey
  • energy
  • global warming
  • water
Issues | States | About Us | Canvass | Jobs | Media Center | Publications | Supporter Center | Take Action | Join or Give | Search