Clean Water Action

Login | Register
Explore Your Community | Discover the Issues
  • Issues
    • Clean Water's Mission
    • Protecting America's Water
    • Global Warming and a New Energy Economy
    • Healthy, Safer Families and Communities
    • Making Democracy Work
  • States
    • California
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • DC
    • Delaware
    • Florida
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Minnesota
    • New Hampshire
    • New Jersey
    • Pennsylvania
    • Rhode Island
    • Texas
    • Virginia
    • National
  • About Us
    • Finances & Effectiveness
    • Offices
    • Board & Officers
    • Senior Staff
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
  • Canvass
  • Jobs
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Apply for a canvass job
  • Media Center
    • Press Releases
    • Media Contacts
  • Publications
    • 2011 Congressional Scorecard
    • Newsletters
    • Reports, Summaries
    • Factsheets
  • Supporter Center
    • 2012 Board of Directors Election
    • 2012 National Member Poll
    • Subscription Maintenance
  • Take Action
    • National Actions
    • Actions by State
    • Volunteer
    • Join the Clean Water Movement
  • Join or Give
    • Donate Now
    • Ways to Give
    • Why Your Support Matters
    • About Your Membership
    • Get the CleanWater Card
  • Blog
    • Subscribe
 

Donate Now

Join or give a gift or find other ways to give to Clean Water Action

Our Birthday

40 years
of
clean water progress

Search

Our View: Stealing From The Future To Pay For Today's Shortfall

New Britain Herald
published Monday, February 8, 2010

The Rell administration, as a way of coping with the state’s budget woes, has proposed three possible sources of future revenue that the state could sell now to raise a $1.3 billion lump sum — in other words, sacrificing future budgets to meet today’s needs.

The governor’s budget office would “securitize” a portion of the charges on electric bills used to support clean energy and conservation initiatives, a move that Roger Smith, campaign director for Clean Water Action, told the Journal Inquirer, would “saddle Connecticut consumers with a future of higher electricity rates to reduce this year’s budget deficit. While the governor claims to be opposed to new taxes, this proposal turns utility bills into a tax collection vehicle for the state.”

Smith added, “There is no free lunch when it comes to electricity. If the governor succeeds in cutting the efficiency programs that are the cheapest way to meet our energy needs, ratepayers will be forced to rely on far more expensive alternatives, resulting in higher rates.”

Read the complete article at the New Britian Herald

Published Date: 
02/08/2010
News Source: 
New Britain Herald
  • Printer-friendly version
Tags:
  • Connecticut
  • democracy
  • energy
  • global warming
Issues | States | About Us | Canvass | Jobs | Media Center | Publications | Supporter Center | Take Action | Join or Give | Search