Letter to Senators: Midnight Rules Relief Act

March 14, 2017

March 14, 2017

Dear Senator:

On behalf of the undersigned organizations and our millions of members and supporters, we strongly urge you to oppose S. 34, the so-called Midnight Rules Relief Act of 2017. This bill is designed to make it easier to repeal public safeguards put in place by the Obama Administration. It would amend the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to enable Congress to repeal many regulations at once by packaging them in a single resolution that would get expedited consideration and require only a majority of votes for passage in the Senate.

The bill would allow Congress to eviscerate crucial public health, environmental, safety, consumer and financial safeguards without due consideration. Using a process that will avoid public scrutiny, its goal is not to address last minute regulations. Rather, it is to dismantle reasonable and effective public protections for the benefit of narrow special interests.

S. 34 is based on several faulty premises, starting with its name. First, the bill applies to any action an Administration has taken during its entire last year in office. The bill is not actually targeting any last-minute actions. In reality, it seeks to deny the President the authority he was elected to use for an entire year, reducing his term to three years – just as the Senate did by blocking consideration of Merrick Garland for the Supreme Court.

Second, even regulations issued in the last months of a term are not last-minute exercises, but the culmination of years of work and public process. Often, they did not become final until late in the President’s time in office because of review or discussion of comments submitted by industry. An extensive body of statutes already ensures the avoidance of hasty rulemaking and requires transparency and public participation. These laws include the Administrative Procedure Act, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, and the Paperwork Reduction Act. These laws, along with longstanding executive orders, require that agency actions meet a very high threshold of due diligence and complex analysis. In fact, those regulations issued late in an Administration are often those that have received the most preparation and analysis.

The term “midnight regulation” is simply an effort to cast a stigma on public protections from the past year that have gone through a process that is no different from that of any other safeguard.

Moreover, the bill is simply an effort to actually reduce – not enhance – scrutiny of rules. The CRA has many problems, but at least it requires regulations to be considered individually. This is important given the CRA’s expedited procedures, its inflexibility – rules can only be repealed in their entirety, not altered – and its potential implications: passage of a CRA resolution of disapproval prevents an agency from doing something “substantially the same” ever again.

This bill would throw such caution to the winds. An unlimited number of disparate regulations could be packaged together, making it difficult, if not impossible, to focus on any specific regulation and luring Congress to vote against many regulations if they want to repeal any single measure in the package. This is the very type of “omnibus” legislating that conservatives and the Republican leadership often decry.

Midnight Rules Relief Act is the opposite of a “good government reform” bill. It would make it easier to repeal protections the public supports by making it harder for Congress to consider – and easier for Congress to hide – the impacts of its actions. We urge you to oppose the Midnight Rules Relief Act and reject the false premise behind it.

Sincerely,

Alaska Wilderness League

American Association of University Women

Asian Pacific Policy & Planning Council

Bend the Arc Jewish Action

Biodiversity for a Livable Climate

BlueGreen Alliance

Bold Alliance

Cahaba River Society

Center for Biological Diversity

Charles River Watershed Association

Clean Air Task Force

Clean Water Action

Climate Hawks Vote

Communications Workers of America

Conservatives for Responsible Stewardship

Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

Defenders of Wildlife

Earth Action, Inc.

Earthjustice

Earthworks

Elders Climate Action

Endangered Habitats League

Environment America

Environmental Advocates of New York

Friends of Alewife Reservation

Friends of the Earth

Gasp

Geos Institute

Green For All

GreenLatinos

Greenpeace USA

Illinois Council of Trout Unlimited

Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy

Interfaith Power & Light

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW

Iowa Interfaith Power & Light

League of Conservation Voters

League of Women Voters of the United States

Long Island Pine Barrens Society

Lowell Parks & Conservation Trust, Inc.

Main Street Alliance

Michigan League of Conservation Voters

Milwaukee Riverkeeper

Montana Conservation Voters

Montana Environmental Information Center

National Council of Jewish Women

National Health Law Program, Inc.

Natural Resources Defense Council

NETWORK Lobby for Catholic Social Justice

Nevada Conservation League

NextGen Climate

Nor'East Chapter of Trout Unlimited (MA)

Ocean Conservancy

Oceana

Physicians for Social Responsibility

Physicians for Social Responsibility, Philadelphia

Population Connection Action Fund

Prairie Rivers Network

Rachel Carson Council

Safe Climate Campaign

San Juan Citizens Alliance

Save The River Upper St. Lawrence Riverkeeper

Sierra Club

Southern Environmental Law Center

Southern Oregon Climate Action Now

Students for a Just and Stable Future

The Praxis Project

The Vet Voice Founation

The Wilderness Society

Virginia League of Conservation Voters

Voces Verdes

Voices for Progress

Western Organization of Resource Councils

Women's Voices. Women Vote Action Fund

Yukon River Inter-Tribal Watershed Council

 

Region/State: